Tag Archives: SPLA Reporting
You have questions…We have answers. Another month, and another list of licensing questions asked by the hosting community.
- I have a small hosting company that runs primarily Linux machines with a few Windows VM’s mixed in. The only thing we do customer facing with Windows systems is a small number of users access our application via a published app over RDP Web. Do I need SPLA?
Yes. You have Windows running in your cloud environment. It does not matter how small or large the environment is. One thing you might want to check out is the Cloud Platform Suite. You must run Hyper-V and System Center but it could lower your costs.
- I get CSP from one reseller and SPLA from another. Do I qualify for the new QMTH addendum or do I need to get it all from one source? Totally confused.
In QMTH, you are the CSP partner, not someone else. I am guessing you are using the CSP reseller to go indirect. If that is the case, you must become CSP Direct authorized. Purchasing CSP from a third-party does not qualify you for QMH. That being said, your customer can purchase CSP from any organization and you can host it for them (if you are QMH authorized).
- The audit bug got me. I think it’s because my reseller refuses to submit my usage report even though I sent it to them several times. Any advice?
Microsoft can audit any partner they choose. There’s not one factor that triggers an audit. More eyes will be watching if you are continually delinquent on your monthly report. The biggest reason why a reseller does not submit a usage report is because the provider is delinquent on their payments. Are you up to date? All payments paid to the reseller?
- Can I rent a PC using the QMTH addendum? I know in the past I could rent a Windows desktop license in SPLA. Can I do it now?
I think it makes sense to do so but unfortunately it is not part of the addendum. I would love feedback here. Section C of the QMTH addendum states” “This Amendment does not authorize Customer to resell, distribute, or otherwise provide End User or CSP Licensees direct access to Windows 10 Software” In order to lease a PC to a third-party you need to follow the Microsoft Leasing Agreement.
- I report Office, Exchange, SharePoint and Skype. I heard rumors of a price increase coming in the pipeline from various resellers that I reached out to. Any truth?
Let me put it to you this way – The products you just mentioned happen to be part of Office 365. I don’t foresee Microsoft lowering pricing in SPLA for the same products offered by Microsoft.
Thanks for reading,
PS – What was the SPLA partner’s response to my answer for question 5? “That’s BS Mate!” My response? “Don’t shoot the messenger.” Have a question? Email email@example.com
Jimbo had a small IT firm for which he provided backup, security, and hosting for two clients. He also purchased Office 365 licenses for a handful of users directly from the Microsoft Office 365 website and would bill them accordingly. Jimbo also had an application he tried to develop to help end users better communicate with one another. It was similar to SharePoint, but more seamless and had better integration with third-party applications. He had a SPLA, and had one person who submitted their usage report to their reseller. Unfortunately, that person got sick and passed away. Jimbo was sad and so was the rest of the staff.
To put his mind at ease, he spent every waking hour improving his application. He thought it was going to be the next best thing. I experienced the application firsthand myself, and found it to be a powerful tool. I even asked to invest in it, but without any money, (Mrs. SPLA Man spent it all at Target), I had nothing to invest with.
Fast forward a year later. Jimbo is still working on improving the application, and he's still hosting. One day, Jimbo received an email from Microsoft. It was titled “Self-Audit”, Jimbo was getting audited. One thing left unmentioned, Jimbo is the nicest guy on the planet. He replied to Microsoft and in the end, provided them with everything. All his server information, customer name, and reporting history. It was an auditor’s dream.
Several weeks later, Microsoft provided Jimbo with the findings. He owed $450,000 in unreported licensing fees. Why so high? No usage was being reported since the lady who reported SPLA passed away. When she was reporting, she reported the wrong thing. Instead of licensing Windows Datacenter, she reported Standard. Instead of reporting physical processors and/or cores, she reported per VM. Everything was a mess. Jimbo, who neglected his hosting practice for months to focus on his application, was left feeling very uncertain about his future. He did not have the funds to pay for licenses.
It’s unfortunate, but Jimbo had to shut down his hosting business. The application he built? Stopped. He tried to sell it, and last I heard very few were interested.
Why such a depressing story and was it true? Yes, the story is true (although slightly embellished). Why share it? I am telling you the story because there are too many organizations doing the same thing. They have one person who manages the licenses, one person who was in contact with the reseller, and one person who knew what they were reporting. What happens if that person leaves? Too many organizations are also buying Office 365, but not getting the best discount.
Licensing is challenging, and in the case of Jimbo, his love wasn’t reporting usage, it was developing an application. He should have had allocated resources to help manage his SPLA, so he could focus on what he knows best, the technology.
I am always asked why I created splalicensing.com and what's so different about SPLA Man than other blogs. I think the main difference is honesty. I am your licensing Siri or Alexa. I am SPLAlexa. (that was bad). Don’t be Jimbo.
Thanks for reading,
Microsoft made a pretty big announcement around Windows 10 and CSP. Here’s a breakdown for those that are interested:
- Software Assurance is not included
- Windows 10 is available E3 and in CSP only
- Customers need a qualified OS license. In other words, this is an upgrade license only.
- Not available under SPLA
- Not available in the shared computer activation model.
- Per user licensing with the ability to license on up to 5 devices per license.
- No minimum and surprise…no maximum either.
- Subscription is 1 year
- Pricing varies
- New use rights highlighted in the Product Terms
So why does this stink now but could be great later? Pay attention to number 1, 4, and 5 in the list above. That’s what stinks. Think this will allow VDI? Think again.
So why not? Why the mystery around VDI and SPLA? If I was Microsoft, I would go ahead and allow it but for only a select few SPLA providers. Those providers are:
- Report on time. Not one late payment/report during their agreement no matter what the excuse – “My reseller sucks” is not an excuse. It’s a good reason to work with me though 🙂
- Deployed Hyper V (they must have some incentive to do this)
- Joined CSP program.
There you have it. Microsoft wins big time – all that missed revenue from non reporters will get reported. Now you, the compliant service provider, will be allowed VDI in SPLA.
The likelihood of this happening is slim to none. I do think Microsoft is missing out with the Windows 10/VDI restriction. Ever since I started in SPLA, I’ve been asked about VDI (or the lack thereof). That was 11 years ago.
Thanks for reading,